Robert A. Klingler

Robert A. Klingler Co., L.P.A. Logo

(513) 665-9500

Mobile

  • Home
  • About Us
    • How We Handle Cases
    • Fee Arrangements
    • Representative Cases
    • What Clients Say About Us
  • Our Team
    • Robert A. Klingler
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment Law
      • FMLA
      • Sexual Harassment
      • Wrongful Termination
      • Workplace Discrimination
        • Age Discrimination
        • Disability Discrimination
        • Pregnancy Discrimination
        • Sexual Discrimination
        • Race Discrimination
      • Class Actions
      • Wage, Hour, and Overtime Law
      • Non-Compete & Severance Agreements
      • Executive Employment Contracts
      • Employment Mediation
    • Whistleblower Law
    • Business Litigation
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Personal Injury
      • Motor Vehicle Accidents
      • Product Liability
      • Premises Liability
      • Nursing Home Abuse in Ohio
  • FAQ
    • FAQ Video Library
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Wrongful Termination Checklist
  • Contact
  • For Lawyers
CONTACT US
CALL US

Wage Hour And Overtime Law: Must Employers Pay For Cell Phones?

October 27, 2014 By Robert Klingler

wage-hour-overtime-law-employers-pay-cell-phones

Most employers would not be happy if their employees did not have cell phones, yet few employers offer to pay for their employees’ cell phone. In Cochran v. Schwan’s Home Services, Inc. the California Court of Appeals examined whether, under federal wage, hour, and overtime law, an employer is required to reimburse an employee for the expense of mandatory use of a personal cell phone for work purposes, or whether an employer is only required to reimburse the employee for expenses he or she would not have otherwise incurred absent the job. The court held that a partial reimbursement is always required.

  • The Case

The plaintiff in this case filed an action on behalf of himself and all other customer service managers who were not reimbursed for expenses related to the work use of their personal cell phones. The California Court of Appeal decided these employees must be reimbursed a reasonable portion of their cell phone bills for work-related use.

  • The Court’s Decision

The court relied on Section § 2802 of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which provides in relevant part that “[a]n employer shall indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties…”. The court reasoned that the purpose of this statute was to prevent employers from passing on their business operating expenses to their employees.

The employer argued it had no duty to reimburse its employees because many of them had unlimited cell phone plans and did not in fact incur expenses due to work-related phone calls. Moreover, the employer reasoned that many employees did not pay for their own cell phone. Rather, third parties, such as family members, paid for the employee’s cell phone. The Court of Appeals, however, was unpersuaded by these arguments, reasoning that the real issue was whether the employer should be required to reimburse the expense. The court held that to show an employer is liable under Section 2802, “[a]n employee need only show that he or she was required to use a personal cell phone to make work-related calls, and he or she was not reimbursed”.

The Court of Appeals’ decision is straightforward: employers must reimburse a reasonable percentage of an employee’s cell phone bill if the employee is required to use his or her cell phone for work purposes. The Court of Appeals, however, found the issue of damages was more complicated. Rather than decide this issue, it remanded the case to the trial court to review how damages might be proven.

  • Future Implications

Courts in Ohio and in many other jurisdictions have not addressed this issue. If, however, these courts adopt the holding in Cochran v. Schwan’s Home Services, Inc., many employers will be affected. In today’s society, most employers allow employees to use their own personal cell phone for work purposes.

This ruling will affect the vast majority of employers in California, and elsewhere if it is adopted by other courts. Most employers allow employees to use their own personal cell phones for work purposes. Some employers have Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policies due to perceived productivity gains and cost savings. If you have questions about your employer’s obligation to reimburse you for required use of cell phones, contact an experienced wage, hour, and overtime law attorney to discuss your rights.

Filed Under: Employment Law, Wage and Hour Law

Blog Categories

  • Blog
  • Cincinnati
  • Disability/ADA/FMLA
  • Discrimination
  • Employment Law
  • Gender Discrimination
  • Hostile Work Environment
  • Noncompete Agreements
  • Personal Injury
  • Pregnancy Discrimination
  • Retaliation
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Trial and Life
  • Uncategorized
  • Wage and Hour Law

Blog Archive

  • December 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • October 2013
  • April 2013
  • February 2013
cards
Robert A. Klingler Co., L.P.A.
525 Vine Street, Suite 2320
Cincinnati, OH 45202
(513) 665-9500
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Attorneys
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • About Us
    ▼
    • How We Handle Cases
    • Fee Arrangements
    • Representative Cases
    • What Clients Say About Us
  • Our Team
    ▼
    • Robert A. Klingler
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Employment Law
    • Whistleblower Law
    • Business Litigation
    • Personal Injury
  • FAQ
    ▼
    • FAQ Video Library
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Blog
    • Wrongful Termination Checklist
  • Contact
  • For Lawyers